Skip navigation

U.S. v. Chisholm, No. 93-7083 (11th Cir.) (73 F.3d 304) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)

Case vacated a sentence based on crack cocaine where evidence was insufficient to support conclusion that crack was reasonably forseeable and within scope of criminal activity of conspiracy.

The two defendants in this case arranged for the sale of some 24 kilograms of powder cocaine to a crack dealer, and ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login