U.S. v. Granado, No. 94-3195 (7th Cir.) (72 F.3d 1287) (December 22, 1995) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
February 12, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Ability to Pay.
The defendant objected to the imposition of a $100,000 fine, arguing that he had no assets to pay the fine, that he had 33 (sic!) children, that he had been receiving disability payments from the Social Security Administration for several years, that he had not completed high school and that ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. $141,770.00 in U.S. Currency, No. 97-2393 (8th Cir.) (157 F.3d 600) (October 5, 1998) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- U.S. v. Granado, No. 94-3195 (7th Cir.) (72 F.3d 1287) (December 22, 1995) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Chisholm, No. 93-7083 (11th Cir.) (73 F.3d 304) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Wacker, No. 93-3372 (10th Cir.) (72 F.3d 1453) (December 26, 1995) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Tibolt, No. 94-2221 (1st Cir.) (72 F.3d 965) (December 29, 1995) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Neadle, No. 94-7417 (3rd Cir.) (72 F.3d 1104) (December 19, 1995) (Judge Jane R. Roth)
- U.S. v. Galbreth, No. Crim. 94-197 MV (D.N.M.) (908 F.Supp. 877) (October 4, 1995) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Padilla, No. 95-494-CR-Atkins (S.D.Fla.) (908 F.Supp. 923) (November 27, 1995) (Judge C. Clyde Atkins)
- U.S. v. Cosgrove, No. 92-5078 (11th Cir.) (73 F.3d 297) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Emmett Ripley Cox)
- U.S. v. Arrington, No. 95-1566 (7th Cir.) (73 F.3d 144) (January 2, 1996) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Ward, No. Crim. 95-0216-A (E.D.Va.) (908 F.Supp. 350) (December 1, 1995) (Judge Thomas Selby III Ellis)
- U.S. v. Wacker, No. 93-3372 (10th Cir.) (72 F.3d 1453) (December 26, 1995) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Denalli, No. 94-3067 (11th Cir.) (73 F.3d 328) (January 23, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Neadle, No. 94-7417 (3rd Cir.) (72 F.3d 1104) (December 19, 1995) (Judge Jane R. Roth)
- U.S. v. Arrington, No. 95-1566 (7th Cir.) (73 F.3d 144) (January 2, 1996) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Wacker, No. 93-3372 (10th Cir.) (72 F.3d 1453) (December 26, 1995) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Cosgrove, No. 92-5078 (11th Cir.) (73 F.3d 297) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Emmett Ripley Cox)
- Finn v. Schiller, No. 94-2373 (4th Cir.) (72 F.3d 1182) (January 3, 1996) (Judge Robert F. Chapman)
More from these topics:
- Fines and Fees Destroy the Impoverished and Perpetuate Mass Incarceration, Jan. 15, 2025. Effects of Mass Incarceration, Ability to Pay.
- $3.25 Million Settlement Reached With Defendants Jailed in Missouri “Debtor’s Prison” for Unpaid Fines, Fees, Oct. 15, 2023. Settlements, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Ability to Pay, Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP).
- Corizon Executes “Texas Two-Step,” Spinning Off Debt Into Bankrupt New Firm to Avoid Paying Creditors and Lawsuit Winners, Aug. 15, 2023. Corizon, Settlements, Ability to Pay.
- Missouri Senior Citizen Jailed Three Days After Letting Dog Off Leash, April 27, 2023. Restitution, Ability to Pay.
- Idaho Joins Missouri in Banning Incarceration for Inability To Pay Court Fines, Fees, Sept. 30, 2022. Ability to Pay, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
- California Court Tells State Prisoner His $12 Monthly Pay Is Enough to Pay Court-Ordered Fines and Fees, Aug. 18, 2022. Seizure of Prisoner Funds, Ability to Pay.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Court Violated Humphrey by Setting High Bail Without Considering Financial Condition of Defendant or Nonfinancial Conditions of Release, June 15, 2022. Procedural Default/Error, Bail/Pretrial Release, Ability to Pay.
- Hawaii Supreme Court Orders New Parole Hearing for Prisoner Held Since 1979, May 1, 2022. Restitution, Conditions of, Ability to Pay.
- Did Two Judges Violate Ethics in Florida Voting Rights Restoration Case?, Oct. 15, 2020. Ethical Restraints, Judicial Disqualification/Misconduct, Ability to Pay, Felon Disenfranchisement Statute.
- Florida’s “Pay-to-Vote” System Struck Down, July 1, 2020. Ability to Pay, Constitutional Challenges/Claims.