Skip navigation

U.S. v. Neadle, No. 94-7417 (3rd Cir.) (72 F.3d 1104) (December 19, 1995) (Judge Jane R. Roth)

In this case the defendant was convicted of insurance fraud on the grounds that he had misrepresented the amount of capital available to cover losses for a new insurance company. When Hurricane Hugo hit, he was charged not with the $700,000 of capital that he misrepresented, but with some $20 ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login