Skip navigation

U.S. v. Valle, No. 95-1832 (1st Cir.) (72 F.3d 210) (December 26, 1995) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)

Case held that expert testimony indicating an intent to distribute was not improper opinion testimony on the ultimate issue; and in the process gave a detailed explanation of the history and purpose of Rule 704(b).

In this drug case, the defendant did not dispute his possession of crack cocaine, but ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login