Cooper v. Brookshire, No. 94-50782 (5th Cir.) (70 F.3d 377) (November 22, 1996) (Judge Jacques L. Jr. Wiener)
Loaded on Jan. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
January 01, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Pro Se Issues.
Case held that the "mailbox" rule adopted in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) applied to actions filed by pro se prisoners under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Booker, No. 95-1747 (7th Cir.) (70 F.3d 488) (November 16, 1995) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Cooper, No. 95-1005 (10th Cir.) (70 F.3d 563) (November 20, 1995) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
- U.S. v. Bush, No. 94-6381 (10th Cir.) (70 F.3d 557) (November 15, 1995) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 94-10817 (5th Cir.) (70 F.3d 353) (November 21, 1995) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Bayless, No. 95 Cr. 533 (HB) (S.D.N.Y.) (921 F.Supp. 211) (April 1, 1996) (Judge Harold Jr. Baer)
- U.S. v. Shore, No. CV 95-0181 (E.D.N.Y.) (903 F.Supp. 385) (October 21, 1995) (Judge Arthur D. Spatt)
- Taft v. Vines, No. 94-2293 (4th Cir.) (70 F.3d 304) (November 16, 1995) (Judge Francis D. Jr. Murnaghan)
- U.S. v. Bayless, No. 96 Cr. 533 (S.D.N.Y.) (926 F.Supp. 405) (May 1, 1996) (Judge Harold Jr. Baer)
- U.S. v. Ing, No. 94-10097 (9th Cir.) (70 F.3d 553) (November 17, 1995) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- Cooper v. Brookshire, No. 94-50782 (5th Cir.) (70 F.3d 377) (November 22, 1996) (Judge Jacques L. Jr. Wiener)
- U.S. v. Cooper, No. 95-1005 (10th Cir.) (70 F.3d 563) (November 20, 1995) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
- U.S. v. ($274,481.00), No. Civ. 94-2128CCC (D.Puerto Rico) (903 F.Supp. 259) (August 30, 1995) (Judge Carmen Consuelo Cerezo)
- U.S. v. Chabot, No. 95-1255 (2nd Cir.) (70 F.3d 259) (November 15, 1995) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Ybarra, No. 94-20853 (5th Cir.) (70 F.3d 362) (November 22, 1995) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Ing, No. 94-10097 (9th Cir.) (70 F.3d 553) (November 17, 1995) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- U.S. v. Bayless, No. 95 Cr. 533 (HB) (S.D.N.Y.) (913 F.Supp. 232) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Harold Jr. Baer)
More from these topics:
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces When Deciding Defendant’s Pro Se Motion Requesting Counsel on Postconviction Review, Trial Court Must Either Deny Entire Motion or Permit All Claims If Any Have Arguable Merit, Dec. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, After Request for Counsel, Pro Se Issues.
- ‘Data for Defenders’: Valuable New Resource for Defense Counsel and Pro Se Litigants, Oct. 1, 2023. Databases, Pro Se Issues.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Retaliation Suit by Pro Se Michigan Prisoner, July 1, 2021. Retaliation for Litigating, Pro Se Issues.
- Ninth Circuit: Rehaif Error Requires Automatic Dismissal of Indictment, Jan. 15, 2021. Felon in Possession Statute, Pro Se Issues, Knowingly and Voluntarily Made.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.