Skip navigation

Kitterman v. U.S., No. 4:94CV2291-DJS (E.D.Mo.) (904 F.Supp. 987) (November 14, 1995) (Judge Donald J. Stohr)

While the Eighth Circuit may not have yet issued its ruling on the double jeopardy implications of successive criminal and civil proceedings (see United States v. Clementi, above), the lower courts continue to chip away at the concept. Here, Judge Stohr holds that "the double jeopardy challenge is foreclosed by ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login