U.S. v. Anderson, No. 94-10817 (5th Cir.) (70 F.3d 353) (November 21, 1995) (Per Curiam)
This is an intriguing case that peremptorily rejects the hot-potato suggestion made by District Judge John McBryde that the defendant had received favorable treatment because his uncle worked with the DEA and with the AUSA in this case. The defendant pled guilty to a series of drug crimes and he ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login