Skip navigation

U.S. v. Greene, No. 95-5038 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 232) (December 11, 1995) (Judge Karl S. Forester)

Court rejected use of criminal livelihood enhancement, holding that his primary occupation and the monies her earned derived from the positions he held and not from the fraud.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login