Skip navigation

U.S. v. Hall, No. 95-5314 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 569) (December 12, 1995) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)

In this case the defendant argued that the district court erred in computing her criminal history category by including four convictions for worthless checks as "similar" to her bank fraud conviction. While she acknowledged that the correction would not change her criminal history category, and thus not change her sentence, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login