Skip navigation

U.S. v. Ing, No. 94-10097 (9th Cir.) (70 F.3d 553) (November 17, 1995) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)

Here the Court held that the assertion of an entrapment defense is "not necessarily incompatible with acceptance of responsibility" under U.S.S.G. ยง 3E1.1.

In this case, the defendant's PSI Report flatly stated that because the defendant had asserted the defense of entrapment, he was not entitled to a reduction in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login