U.S. v. Lussier, No. 94-1377 (2nd Cir.) (71 F.3d 456) (August 18, 1995) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)
Loaded on Jan. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
January 22, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Conflict of Interest.
Case suggests that a district court's failure to make an attorney conflict of interest inquiry constitutes "per se reversible error" (Id., at 461).
In this case the court held that "when a defense attorney cross examines a former client who is a witness against the defendant, a conflict of interest …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Wolfe, No. 95-3373 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 611) (December 15, 1995) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- U.S. v. Wolfe, No. 95-3373 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 611) (December 15, 1995) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- U.S. v. Lussier, No. 94-1377 (2nd Cir.) (71 F.3d 456) (August 18, 1995) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)
- U.S. v. Grandlund, No. 95-50117 (5th Cir.) (71 F.3d 507) (December 13, 1995) (Judge Henry A. Politz)
- U.S. v. Miller, No. 94-8143 (11th Cir.) (71 F.3d 813) (January 2, 1996) (Judge David W. Dyer)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 94-1743 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 539) (November 20, 1995) (Judge Cornelia G. Kennedy)
- U.S. v. Booker, No. 94-3847 (7th Cir.) (71 F.3d 685) (December 6, 1995) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- Spear v. Sowders, No. 93-5528 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 626) (December 19, 1995) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- U.S. v. Grandlund, No. 95-50117 (5th Cir.) (71 F.3d 507) (December 13, 1995) (Judge Henry A. Politz)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 95-5314 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 569) (December 12, 1995) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 95-5314 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 569) (December 12, 1995) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 95-5314 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 569) (December 12, 1995) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- U.S. v. Miller, No. 94-8143 (11th Cir.) (71 F.3d 813) (January 2, 1996) (Judge David W. Dyer)
- U.S. v. Wiedyk, No. 94-2342 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 602) (December 14, 1995) (Judge Cornelia G. Kennedy)
- U.S. v. Haynes, No. Cr. A. No. 90-00422-5 (CRR) (D.D.C.) (906 F.Supp. 5) (November 30, 1995) (Judge Charles R. Richey)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 95-5314 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 569) (December 12, 1995) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Defense Counsel Had Actual Conflict of Interest Where Own Performance During Police Interview of Defendant Could Serve as Basis of Motion to Suppress Based on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, New Trial Required W, March 15, 2025. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Motions To Suppress, Conflict of Interest.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, Dec. 15, 2023. Counsel - Constructive denial of, Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel.
- Texas Prosecutor Spent 20-Year Career Also Working as Law Clerk to Judges He Appeared Before, May 5, 2022. Attorney Misconduct, Conflict of Interest.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, June 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Conflict of Interest.
- "Kentucky Supreme Court: Hearing on Defense Counsel’s Fitness Is Critical Stage at Which Defendant Has Right to Be Present With Conflict-Free Counsel", March 15, 2021. Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.