U.S. v. Walls, No. 94-3033 (D.C. Cir.) (70 F.3d 1323) (December 8, 1995) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
Here the Court generally rejected the defense of sentencing entrapment where the Government chose to sell the defendant crack rather than powdered cocaine. It wrote: "Whatever vitality the outrageous-conduct defense might have . . . , and we doubt it has much, we conceive of no basis for allowing this ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login