Skip navigation

U.S. v. Wolfe, No. 95-3373 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 611) (December 15, 1995) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)

The defendant in this case objected to being charged, for sentencing purposes, with the full amount of the loss attributable to a Ponzi scheme on the grounds that 90% of the funds would be recovered by the bankruptcy trustee. The Court rejects that argument. While acknowledging that Application Note 7 ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login