Skip navigation

U.S. v. Hall, No. 96-1386 (8th Cir.) (85 F.3d 367) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)

This case explores Rule 606(b), which governs jurors’ competency to testify with respect to their
deliberations. After the defendants were convicted at trial, the filed a motion for a new trial on the basis
of one juror’s affidavit that the jury had overheard, during numerous bench conferences, references to
other ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login