U.S. v. Raposa, No. 95-2088 (1st Cir.) (84 F.3d 502) (May 29, 1996) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
Loaded on July 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
July 01, 1996
Filed under:
Due Process,
Punch And Jurists.
Case discusses whether sentencing courts may consider illegally seized evidence at sentencing.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Raposa, No. 95-2088 (1st Cir.) (84 F.3d 502) (May 29, 1996) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
- U.S. v. Raposa, No. 95-2088 (1st Cir.) (84 F.3d 502) (May 29, 1996) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
- U.S. v. Gossens, No. 95-5520 (4th Cir.) (84 F.3d 697) (May 28, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Gossens, No. 95-5520 (4th Cir.) (84 F.3d 697) (May 28, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-1143(L) (2nd Cir.) (114 F.3d 400) (June 12, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 95-1882 (7th Cir.) (84 F.3d 931) (May 21, 1996) (Judge William J. Bauer)
More from these topics:
- Lawsuit Over Mailroom Abuses by Washington DOC Leads to Policy Changes, June 1, 2024. Retaliation for Litigating, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Photos, Sexually Explicit Materials, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail.
- Misadventures in Mail Censorship, Jan. 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Grievances, Mail, Publications/Books, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Censorship, Prison Regulations.
- Eleventh Circuit Addresses First Amendment, Due Process Interests in Georgia Prisoner Emails, Jan. 1, 2024. Electronic Monitoring, Qualified Immunity, Due Process, First Amendment, rights, Attorney Misconduct/Disqualification, Email and IP Addresses, Prison Mail, Legitimate Penological Interests.
- Federal Judge Says Alaska DOC Policy Rejecting Prisoner Mail Without Notice Violates Due Process, Nov. 30, 2022. Due Process.
- Mailbox Rule Inapplicable to Prisoners Represented by Counsel, Oct. 1, 2021. Due Process, Legal Mail, Periods of Delay, Self-representation.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.