Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Richardson, No. 94-5193 (10th Cir.) (86 F.3d 1537) (June 6, 1996) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)

Loaded on July 1, 1996 published in Punch and Jurists July 29, 1996
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Possession or Use of Firearms.

Although the Court affirmed the conviction in this case, it held that to prove a defendant "used" a gun during and in relation to the underlying crime, it must prove that he "intended" that the weapon would be available for use during the crime.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Lagasse, No. 95-2109 (1st Cir.) (87 F.3d 18) (June 25, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
  2. U.S. v. Allison, No. 95-10289 (9th Cir.) (86 F.3d 940) (June 24, 1996) (Judge Melvin Brunetti)
  3. U.S. v. Richardson, No. 94-5193 (10th Cir.) (86 F.3d 1537) (June 6, 1996) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
  4. Tress v. U.S., No. 95-3229 (7th Cir.) (87 F.3d 188) (June 14, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  5. U.S. v. Sims, No. 96-1068 (7th Cir.) (144 F.3d 1082) (May 22, 1998) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
  6. U.S. v. Taghizadeh, No. 95-50222 (9th Cir.) (87 F.3d 287) (June 26, 1996) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)

More from these topics: