Skip navigation

U.S. v. Watkins, No. 95-3169 (10th Cir.) (85 F.3d 498) (June 7, 1996) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)

Case held that the provisions of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(6) protecting statements made during plea negotiations do not apply to statements made after the plea agreement was finalized.

The defendant in this case was charged with several drug counts. He and his counsel ultimately entered into plea negotiations and in that connection ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login