Skip navigation

U.S. v. Watkins, No. 95-3169 (10th Cir.) (85 F.3d 498) (June 7, 1996) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)

Case held that the provisions of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(6) protecting statements made during plea negotiations do not apply to statements made after the plea agreement was finalized.

Although this case does not refer to Rule 410, it does relate to the admissibility of statements made
during plea discussions. The defendant in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login