Skip navigation

U.S. v. Woodrup, No. 95-5284 (4th Cir.) (86 F.3d 359) (June 18, 1996) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)

Case held that because a sentence imposed upon revocation of a term of supervised release is an authorized part of the original sentence, punishment for the later offense is not barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login