U.S. v. Anderson, No. 95-3109 (D.C. Cir.) (82 F.3d 436) (April 16, 1996) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
Loaded on June 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
June 03, 1996
Filed under:
Due Process,
Punch And Jurists.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK - The evils of allowing the prosecutor to control the sentencing process were graphically described by District Judge Michael when he wrote:
"Due process in sentencing, should, at its most basic, include the right to be sentenced by an impartial authority, unbiased and not predisposed in ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Gambetta v. Prison Rehabilitative Industries, No. 96-4253 (11th Cir.) (112 F.3d 1119) (May 15, 1997) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Ready, No. 95-1211(L), No. 840 (2nd Cir.) (82 F.3d 551) (May 2, 1996) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- U.S. v. Mejia, No. 91-6108 (11th Cir.) (82 F.3d 1032) (May 14, 1996) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Various Computers and Computer Equipment, No. 95-3195 (3rd Cir.) (82 F.3d 582) (April 30, 1996) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 95-3109 (D.C. Cir.) (82 F.3d 436) (April 16, 1996) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Edmonson, No. 95-3310-SAC (D.Kan.) (922 F.Supp. 505) (March 29, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
- U.S. v. Montanez, No. 95-2096 (1st Cir.) (82 F.3d 520) (April 24, 1996) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 95-3109 (D.C. Cir.) (82 F.3d 436) (April 16, 1996) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Various Computers and Computer Equipment, No. 95-3195 (3rd Cir.) (82 F.3d 582) (April 30, 1996) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 95-3109 (D.C. Cir.) (82 F.3d 436) (April 16, 1996) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Kouzmine, No. 95 Cr. 846 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (921 F.Supp. 1131) (April 5, 1996) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 95-3109 (D.C. Cir.) (82 F.3d 436) (April 16, 1996) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Crockett, No. 94-3217 (7th Cir.) (82 F.3d 722) (April 26, 1996) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- Gaeta v. U.S., No. Civ. No. 94-11911-JLT (D.Mass.) (921 F.Supp. 864) (March 18, 1996) (Judge Joseph L. Tauro)
- U.S. v. Kouzmine, No. 95 Cr. 846 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (921 F.Supp. 1131) (April 5, 1996) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
- U.S. v. Edmonson, No. 95-3310-SAC (D.Kan.) (922 F.Supp. 505) (March 29, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
More from these topics:
- Lawsuit Over Mailroom Abuses by Washington DOC Leads to Policy Changes, June 1, 2024. Retaliation for Litigating, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Photos, Sexually Explicit Materials, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail.
- Misadventures in Mail Censorship, Jan. 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Grievances, Mail, Publications/Books, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Censorship, Prison Regulations.
- Eleventh Circuit Addresses First Amendment, Due Process Interests in Georgia Prisoner Emails, Jan. 1, 2024. Electronic Monitoring, Qualified Immunity, Due Process, First Amendment, rights, Attorney Misconduct/Disqualification, Email and IP Addresses, Prison Mail, Legitimate Penological Interests.
- Federal Judge Says Alaska DOC Policy Rejecting Prisoner Mail Without Notice Violates Due Process, Nov. 30, 2022. Due Process.
- Mailbox Rule Inapplicable to Prisoners Represented by Counsel, Oct. 1, 2021. Due Process, Legal Mail, Periods of Delay, Self-representation.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.