U.S. v. Crockett, No. 94-3217 (7th Cir.) (82 F.3d 722) (April 26, 1996) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
One of the issues raised by the defendant on this appeal was that the trial court erred by improperly taking into account a transaction that was outside the scope of the charged conspiracy and was not properly categorized as relevant conduct under § 1B1.3(a)(2) of the Guidelines. The Court held ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login