Skip navigation

U.S. v. Edmonson, No. 95-3310-SAC (D.Kan.) (922 F.Supp. 505) (March 29, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)

One of the issues raised in this case was whether the defendant was procedurally barred from bringing a collateral attack based on the Supreme Court's decision in Crosby v. U.S., 506 U.S. 255 (1993). Here, the defendant was tried with another defendant who was in absentia, and he challenged the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login