U.S. v. Ivy, No. 94-6131 (10th Cir.) (83 F.3d 1266) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Wade Brorby)
Loaded on June 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
June 17, 1996
Filed under:
Sanctions,
Punch And Jurists.
The Court also held that the factors a district court should consider in determining if a sanction is appropriate are (1) the reasons the Government delayed producing the requested materials, including whether or not the Government acted in bad faith when it failed to comply with the discovery order; (2) ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 95-1604 (2nd Cir.) (83 F.3d 582) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Guido Calabresi)
- U.S. v. Say, No. 2:95-cr-44-01 (D.Vt.) (923 F.Supp. 611) (November 17, 1995) (Judge William K. III Sessions)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 95-1511 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 488) (April 24, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Ivy, No. 94-6131 (10th Cir.) (83 F.3d 1266) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 95-1511 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 488) (April 24, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- Taft v. Vines, No. 94-2293 (4th Cir.) (83 F.3d 681) (May 14, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Muse, No. 95-5315 (4th Cir.) (83 F.3d 672) (May 13, 1996) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Fountain, No. 95-2264 (8th Cir.) (83 F.3d 946) (May 1, 1996) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. Cusumano, No. 94-8056 (10th Cir.) (83 F.3d 1247) (May 8, 1996) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 95-1511 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 488) (April 24, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- Shahzade v. Gregory, No. 92-12139-EFH (D.Mass.) (923 F.Supp. 286) (May 8, 1996) (Judge Edward F. Harrington)
- U.S. v. Ivy, No. 94-6131 (10th Cir.) (83 F.3d 1266) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Tellier, No. 94-1451, No. 18 (2nd Cir.) (83 F.3d 578) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Clear Error’ Review Applies to District Courts’ Factual Findings for Brady Challenges and Affirms District Court’s Mid-Trial Order Excluding Witness Testimony and Imposing Monetary Sanctions for Government’s Brady Violation, Feb. 1, 2025. Sanctions, Eyewitness Testimony, Brady Rule violations, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Factual Disputes/Findings, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Wellpath Sanctioned for Destroying Evidence in Two Oregon Jail Death Suits, Nov. 15, 2024. Private Contractors, Sanctions, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Evidence - Destruction/Fabrication/Manipulation of.
- Washington Fined Over $100 Million for Delays in Competency Evaluations and Restoration, Feb. 1, 2024. Sanctions, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness), Civil Commitment, Competency.
- Washington Agencies Sanctioned for Discovery Violations Reach $3.1 Million Settlement with Disabled Woman Allegedly Abused at State Sanctioned Home, Jan. 1, 2024. Attorney Misconduct, Discovery, Sanctions, Discovery - Lateness of.
- $6,000 Sanction for Mississippi Federal Prosecutor Who Lied to Court About COVID-19 Vaccination Status, Oct. 31, 2022. COVID-19, Failure to Protect (General), Sanctions.
- Seventh Circuit: Local Rules Requiring Specific Filings to Summary Judgments Should Not be Used as a Sanction, Nov. 1, 2021. Summary Judgment, Sanctions.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.