Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Jennings, No. 95-3317 (6th Cir.) (83 F.3d 145) (May 8, 1996) (Judge Cornelia G. Kennedy)

Loaded on June 1, 1996 published in Punch and Jurists June 10, 1996
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Sentences - Authority to Modify.

Here the Sixth Circuit adopted the majority view that sentencing following remand should be conducted de novo and is not limited only to the reasons for the remand.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Lindia, No. 95-2200 (1st Cir.) (82 F.3d 1154) (April 18, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
  2. U.S. v. Munoz, No. 95-2133 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 7) (April 26, 1996) (Per Curiam)
  3. Billis v. U.S., No. 95-2161 (8th Cir.) (83 F.3d 209) (May 3, 1996) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Jennings, No. 95-3317 (6th Cir.) (83 F.3d 145) (May 8, 1996) (Judge Cornelia G. Kennedy)
  5. U.S. v. Feldman, No. 95-1900 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 9) (April 26, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
  6. U.S. v. Spiers, No. 95-5335 (3rd Cir.) (82 F.3d 1274) (May 2, 1996) (Judge Timothy K. Lewis)
  7. Boria v. Keane, No. 95-2688, No. 1332 (2nd Cir.) (83 F.3d 48) (May 3, 1996) (Judge Whitman Knapp)
  8. U.S. v. Veloza, No. 95-4407 (11th Cir.) (83 F.3d 380) (May 21, 1996) (Judge Rosemary Barkett)
  9. U.S. v. Stevens, No. 95-1346, No. 1041 (2nd Cir.) (83 F.3d 60) (May 8, 1996) (Per Curiam)
  10. U.S. v. Smith, No. 95-5257 (3rd Cir.) (82 F.3d 1261) (May 6, 1996) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
  11. U.S. v. Singleton, No. 95-40076-01-SAC (D.Kan.) (922 F.Supp. 1522) (March 28, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)

More from these topics: