U.S. v. Kouzmine, No. 95 Cr. 846 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (921 F.Supp. 1131) (April 5, 1996) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
Here the Court rejected the Government's attempt to try two separate immigration fraud conspiracies together, despite the fact that it admitted there was no single overarching scheme nor identity of conspirators.
This case is cited because it is a rare example of a defendant winning a motion under Rule 8(b) ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login