U.S. v. Martinez, No. 95-1511 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 488) (April 24, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
Loaded on June 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
June 17, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Court affirmed the proposition that if the court finds that the defendant had either the intent or capacity to deliver the full amount of drugs under negotiation, then that amount must be included in the drug quantity calculation (Id., at 497).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 95-1604 (2nd Cir.) (83 F.3d 582) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Guido Calabresi)
- U.S. v. Say, No. 2:95-cr-44-01 (D.Vt.) (923 F.Supp. 611) (November 17, 1995) (Judge William K. III Sessions)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 95-1511 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 488) (April 24, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Ivy, No. 94-6131 (10th Cir.) (83 F.3d 1266) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 95-1511 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 488) (April 24, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- Taft v. Vines, No. 94-2293 (4th Cir.) (83 F.3d 681) (May 14, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Muse, No. 95-5315 (4th Cir.) (83 F.3d 672) (May 13, 1996) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Fountain, No. 95-2264 (8th Cir.) (83 F.3d 946) (May 1, 1996) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. Cusumano, No. 94-8056 (10th Cir.) (83 F.3d 1247) (May 8, 1996) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 95-1511 (1st Cir.) (83 F.3d 488) (April 24, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- Shahzade v. Gregory, No. 92-12139-EFH (D.Mass.) (923 F.Supp. 286) (May 8, 1996) (Judge Edward F. Harrington)
- U.S. v. Ivy, No. 94-6131 (10th Cir.) (83 F.3d 1266) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Tellier, No. 94-1451, No. 18 (2nd Cir.) (83 F.3d 578) (May 10, 1996) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
More from these topics:
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.