Skip navigation

Ricketts v. City of Hartford, No. 94-7422, No. 443 (2nd Cir.) (74 F.3d 1397) (January 17, 1996) (Judge J. Daniel Mahoney)

Case held that Rule 608(b) does not preclude impeachment evidence that demonstrates the witness's bias.

Case held that Fed.R.Evid. 608(b) --which generally precludes proof by extrinsic evidence of specific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking or supporting the witness' credibility, other than conviction of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login