Skip navigation

U.S. v. Brothers, No. 95-1303 (3rd Cir.) (75 F.3d 845) (February 1, 1996) (Judge H. Lee Sarokin)

While this decision is not particularly scintillating, it is cited because it shows some of the growing discontent with the level of proof that is required at sentencing. Here, a sentence is overturned because the Court found that certain evidence used at sentencing did not have "sufficient indicia of reliability ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login