Skip navigation

U.S. v. Copple, No. 95-3119 (3rd Cir.) (74 F.3d 479) (February 1, 1996) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)

Here the Court rejected the Government's claim that the defendant had secreted assets, holding that if the Government had no proof, the proper remedy was to have an evidentiary hearing to enable the defendant to prove he no longer had the assets.

This is an important restitution case that debunks ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login