U.S. v. Gambill, No. CR-1-95-092 (S.D.Ohio) (912 F.Supp. 287) (January 2, 1996) (Judge S. Arthur Spiegel)
Loaded on March 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
March 11, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Affirmative Defenses.
Case held that a prosecution of the defendant for failing to register a machine gun when the Government would not accept registration would be fundamentally unfair and was barred by the Due Process Clause.
One of the issues dealt with in this case is the inter-relationship between 18 U.S.C. § …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Ivester, No. 94-5866 (4th Cir.) (75 F.3d 182) (February 15, 1996) (Judge Donald S. Russell)
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-352 (E.D.Pa.) (911 F.Supp. 830) (October 30, 1995) (Judge Louis C. Bechtle)
- Ricketts v. City of Hartford, No. 94-7422, No. 443 (2nd Cir.) (74 F.3d 1397) (January 17, 1996) (Judge J. Daniel Mahoney)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 95-1568 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 382) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Sammoury, No. 95-3043 (D.C. Cir.) (74 F.3d 1341) (February 6, 1996) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Gilberg, No. 95-1586 (1st Cir.) (75 F.3d 15) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Gilberg, No. 95-1586 (1st Cir.) (75 F.3d 15) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Gambill, No. CR-1-95-092 (S.D.Ohio) (912 F.Supp. 287) (January 2, 1996) (Judge S. Arthur Spiegel)
- U.S. v. Morgan, No. 94-40048 (D.Kan.) (911 F.Supp. 1340) (December 4, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
- U.S. v. Wilbon, No. 94-211 (D.N.M.) (911 F.Supp. 1420) (January 4, 1995) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Morgan, No. 94-40048 (D.Kan.) (911 F.Supp. 1340) (December 4, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-352 (E.D.Pa.) (911 F.Supp. 830) (October 30, 1995) (Judge Louis C. Bechtle)
- U.S. v. Caba, No. CR-94-1075 9DGT0 (E.D.N.Y.) (911 F.Supp. 630) (January 11, 1996) (Judge David G. Trager)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. Crim. No. 2:95-00051-02 (S.D.W.Va.) (912 F.Supp. 212) (January 12, 1996) (Judge Charles H. II Haden)
- U.S. v. Russo, No. 95-1123, No. 372 (2nd Cir.) (74 F.3d 1383) (January 11, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- U.S. v. Small, No. 93-3161 (D.C. Cir.) (74 F.3d 1276) (January 30, 1996) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- Thompson v. Borg, No. 94-15846 (9th Cir.) (74 F.3d 1571) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- U.S. v. Schramm, No. 94-3619 (3rd Cir.) (75 F.3d 156) (January 30, 1996) (Judge Timothy K. Lewis)
- U.S. v. Coronado-Cervantes, No. 94-CR-235 MV (D.N.M.) (912 F.Supp. 497) (January 9, 1996) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Ivester, No. 94-5866 (4th Cir.) (75 F.3d 182) (February 15, 1996) (Judge Donald S. Russell)
- U.S. v. Carrillo-Bernal, No. 94-173 MV (D.N.M.) (912 F.Supp. 488) (May 31, 1994) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Gambill, No. CR-1-95-092 (S.D.Ohio) (912 F.Supp. 287) (January 2, 1996) (Judge S. Arthur Spiegel)
- U.S. v. One Parcel of Propery Loc. at 121 Allen Pl., No. 94-6242, No. 360 (2nd Cir.) (75 F.3d 118) (January 26, 1996) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- U.S. v. Major, No. 94 Cr. 448 (MGC) (S.D.N.Y.) (912 F.Supp. 90) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum)
- U.S. v. Covarrubia, No. 94-161 MV (D.N.M.) (911 F.Supp. 1409) (September 2, 1994) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Announces ‘Economic Loss’ Not Required to Violate Federal Wire Fraud Statute, July 1, 2025. Mail and Wire Fraud, Affirmative Defenses.
- SCOTUS Announces ‘Right-to-Control’ Theory Not Valid Basis for Liability Under Federal Wire Fraud Statutes, June 15, 2023. Immunity/Liability, Immediate Control, Affirmative Defenses.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.