U.S. v. Gilberg, No. 95-1586 (1st Cir.) (75 F.3d 15) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
Loaded on March 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
March 11, 1996
Filed under:
Retroactivity,
Punch And Jurists.
One of the several restitution issues covered in this bank fraud case was whether a retroactive application of some 1990 amendments to the Victim and Witness Protection Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-3664) constituted the type of "obvious error" that the Supreme Court announced in U.S. v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Ivester, No. 94-5866 (4th Cir.) (75 F.3d 182) (February 15, 1996) (Judge Donald S. Russell)
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-352 (E.D.Pa.) (911 F.Supp. 830) (October 30, 1995) (Judge Louis C. Bechtle)
- Ricketts v. City of Hartford, No. 94-7422, No. 443 (2nd Cir.) (74 F.3d 1397) (January 17, 1996) (Judge J. Daniel Mahoney)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 95-1568 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 382) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Sammoury, No. 95-3043 (D.C. Cir.) (74 F.3d 1341) (February 6, 1996) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Gilberg, No. 95-1586 (1st Cir.) (75 F.3d 15) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Gilberg, No. 95-1586 (1st Cir.) (75 F.3d 15) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Gambill, No. CR-1-95-092 (S.D.Ohio) (912 F.Supp. 287) (January 2, 1996) (Judge S. Arthur Spiegel)
- U.S. v. Morgan, No. 94-40048 (D.Kan.) (911 F.Supp. 1340) (December 4, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
- U.S. v. Wilbon, No. 94-211 (D.N.M.) (911 F.Supp. 1420) (January 4, 1995) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Morgan, No. 94-40048 (D.Kan.) (911 F.Supp. 1340) (December 4, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-352 (E.D.Pa.) (911 F.Supp. 830) (October 30, 1995) (Judge Louis C. Bechtle)
- U.S. v. Caba, No. CR-94-1075 9DGT0 (E.D.N.Y.) (911 F.Supp. 630) (January 11, 1996) (Judge David G. Trager)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. Crim. No. 2:95-00051-02 (S.D.W.Va.) (912 F.Supp. 212) (January 12, 1996) (Judge Charles H. II Haden)
- U.S. v. Russo, No. 95-1123, No. 372 (2nd Cir.) (74 F.3d 1383) (January 11, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- U.S. v. Small, No. 93-3161 (D.C. Cir.) (74 F.3d 1276) (January 30, 1996) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- Thompson v. Borg, No. 94-15846 (9th Cir.) (74 F.3d 1571) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- U.S. v. Schramm, No. 94-3619 (3rd Cir.) (75 F.3d 156) (January 30, 1996) (Judge Timothy K. Lewis)
- U.S. v. Coronado-Cervantes, No. 94-CR-235 MV (D.N.M.) (912 F.Supp. 497) (January 9, 1996) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Ivester, No. 94-5866 (4th Cir.) (75 F.3d 182) (February 15, 1996) (Judge Donald S. Russell)
- U.S. v. Carrillo-Bernal, No. 94-173 MV (D.N.M.) (912 F.Supp. 488) (May 31, 1994) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Gambill, No. CR-1-95-092 (S.D.Ohio) (912 F.Supp. 287) (January 2, 1996) (Judge S. Arthur Spiegel)
- U.S. v. One Parcel of Propery Loc. at 121 Allen Pl., No. 94-6242, No. 360 (2nd Cir.) (75 F.3d 118) (January 26, 1996) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- U.S. v. Major, No. 94 Cr. 448 (MGC) (S.D.N.Y.) (912 F.Supp. 90) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum)
- U.S. v. Covarrubia, No. 94-161 MV (D.N.M.) (911 F.Supp. 1409) (September 2, 1994) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Announces Sentence ‘Has Not Been Imposed’ for Purposes of First Step Act Retroactivity Upon Resentencing When § 924(c) Offender Sentenced Prior to Act’s Enactment but Sentence Subsequently Vacated, Aug. 1, 2025. Retroactivity, First Step Act, Resentencing, Recidivist Enhancements, Stacking Mandatory Minimum Sentences.
- Connecticut Supreme Court Announces Teague’s ‘Watershed’ Rule Exception to Nonretroactivity of New Constitutional Rule of Criminal Procedure on Collateral Review Has ‘Continued Vitality’ in Connecticut, Adoption of Third Exception to Teague’s Nonretroacti, April 15, 2025. Retroactivity, Criminal Procedure, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Eyewitness Identification.
- California Supreme Court Announces Retroactivity of 2022 Version of Penal Code § 1170 to Upper-Term Sentences Imposed Before Its Enactment, Dec. 15, 2024. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
- Sixth Circuit Strikes Retroactive Application of Parts of Tennessee’s Sweeping Sex Offender Registration, Verification, and Tracking Law, Oct. 1, 2024. Sex Offender Registration, Retroactivity.
- Refuting the Government’s Argument Against Nonretroactive Changes in Law as Grounds for Compassionate Release, Oct. 1, 2024. Retroactivity, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity, Compassionate Release.
- New Mexico Supreme Court Announces Marquez’s Holding That ‘Crime of Shooting at or From Motor Vehicle Cannot Be Predicate Felony Supporting Charge of Felony Murder’ Is New Substantive Rule and Applies Retroactively, Feb. 15, 2024. Retroactivity, Murder/Felony Murder.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Have Discretion to Consider Non-Retroactive Changes in Post-Sentencing Decisional Law in Assessing ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons’ for Sentence Reduction, Oct. 1, 2023. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Resentencing.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Court Erred by Concluding Senate Bill 1393 Does Not Apply to Cases Already Final on Appeal, April 15, 2023. Retroactivity.
- Sixth Circuit Announces Nonretroactive Change in Sentencing Law Is Not an ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reason’ Warranting a Sentence Reduction under Compassionate Release Statute, Feb. 15, 2023. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Compassionate Release.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.