Skip navigation

U.S. v. Ivester, No. 94-5866 (4th Cir.) (75 F.3d 182) (February 15, 1996) (Judge Donald S. Russell)

Case held that defendants cannot claim the benefit of § 3553(f) merely because the Government never sought them out for debriefing; and that the disclosure obligations for the safety valve are more extensive than for acceptance of responsibility.

This is another of the many recent cases that attempts to divine ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login