Skip navigation

U.S. v. Ivester, No. 94-5866 (4th Cir.) (75 F.3d 182) (February 15, 1996) (Judge Donald S. Russell)

Case held that defendants cannot claim the benefit of § 3553(f) merely because the Government never sought them out for debriefing; and that the disclosure obligations for the safety valve are more extensive than for acceptance of responsibility.

This is another of the many recent cases that attempts to divine …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login