U.S. v. Morgan, No. 94-40048 (D.Kan.) (911 F.Supp. 1340) (December 4, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
Loaded on March 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
March 11, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Exclusionary Rule.
Court upheld a broad rummaging search under the exclusionary rule, despite the defendant's claims that the warrant effectively authorized a general rummaging of his property.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Ivester, No. 94-5866 (4th Cir.) (75 F.3d 182) (February 15, 1996) (Judge Donald S. Russell)
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-352 (E.D.Pa.) (911 F.Supp. 830) (October 30, 1995) (Judge Louis C. Bechtle)
- Ricketts v. City of Hartford, No. 94-7422, No. 443 (2nd Cir.) (74 F.3d 1397) (January 17, 1996) (Judge J. Daniel Mahoney)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 95-1568 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 382) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Burney, No. 95-2686 (8th Cir.) (75 F.3d 442) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Sammoury, No. 95-3043 (D.C. Cir.) (74 F.3d 1341) (February 6, 1996) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Gilberg, No. 95-1586 (1st Cir.) (75 F.3d 15) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Gilberg, No. 95-1586 (1st Cir.) (75 F.3d 15) (January 31, 1996) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Gambill, No. CR-1-95-092 (S.D.Ohio) (912 F.Supp. 287) (January 2, 1996) (Judge S. Arthur Spiegel)
- U.S. v. Morgan, No. 94-40048 (D.Kan.) (911 F.Supp. 1340) (December 4, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
- U.S. v. Wilbon, No. 94-211 (D.N.M.) (911 F.Supp. 1420) (January 4, 1995) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Morgan, No. 94-40048 (D.Kan.) (911 F.Supp. 1340) (December 4, 1996) (Judge Sam A. Crow)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-352 (E.D.Pa.) (911 F.Supp. 830) (October 30, 1995) (Judge Louis C. Bechtle)
- U.S. v. Caba, No. CR-94-1075 9DGT0 (E.D.N.Y.) (911 F.Supp. 630) (January 11, 1996) (Judge David G. Trager)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. Crim. No. 2:95-00051-02 (S.D.W.Va.) (912 F.Supp. 212) (January 12, 1996) (Judge Charles H. II Haden)
- U.S. v. Russo, No. 95-1123, No. 372 (2nd Cir.) (74 F.3d 1383) (January 11, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- U.S. v. Small, No. 93-3161 (D.C. Cir.) (74 F.3d 1276) (January 30, 1996) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- Thompson v. Borg, No. 94-15846 (9th Cir.) (74 F.3d 1571) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- U.S. v. Schramm, No. 94-3619 (3rd Cir.) (75 F.3d 156) (January 30, 1996) (Judge Timothy K. Lewis)
- U.S. v. Coronado-Cervantes, No. 94-CR-235 MV (D.N.M.) (912 F.Supp. 497) (January 9, 1996) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Ivester, No. 94-5866 (4th Cir.) (75 F.3d 182) (February 15, 1996) (Judge Donald S. Russell)
- U.S. v. Carrillo-Bernal, No. 94-173 MV (D.N.M.) (912 F.Supp. 488) (May 31, 1994) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Gambill, No. CR-1-95-092 (S.D.Ohio) (912 F.Supp. 287) (January 2, 1996) (Judge S. Arthur Spiegel)
- U.S. v. One Parcel of Propery Loc. at 121 Allen Pl., No. 94-6242, No. 360 (2nd Cir.) (75 F.3d 118) (January 26, 1996) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- U.S. v. Major, No. 94 Cr. 448 (MGC) (S.D.N.Y.) (912 F.Supp. 90) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum)
- U.S. v. Covarrubia, No. 94-161 MV (D.N.M.) (911 F.Supp. 1409) (September 2, 1994) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
More from these topics:
- Oregon Parole Hearing Exclusion Rule Invalidated, Sept. 15, 2023. Parole Board Misconduct, Murder/Felony Murder, Exclusionary Rule, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Good-Faith Exception to Exclusionary Rule Inapplicable to Warrant Based on Affidavit Stating Cellphones Found at Scene of Traffic Crash ‘May’ Contain Evidence, May 15, 2023. Traffic Stops, Good Faith Exception, Exclusionary Rule.
- California Supreme Court Announces Predicate Offenses for Gang Enhancement or Gang Participation Not Provable Using Expert Witness Testimony Without Personal Knowledge of Facts, Sept. 15, 2021. Opinions and Expert Testimony, Gang Membership, Exclusionary Rule.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.