Skip navigation

U.S. v. Adu, No. 95-1488 (6th Cir.) (82 F.3d 119) (April 15, 1996) (Judge Nelson Lively)

In this case, even though the PSI Report stated that the defendant "may meet the provisions of § 5C1.2", the court refused to grant any sentence reduction below the mandatory minimum. On appeal, the Sixth Circuit affirmed, noting that in creating the safety valve reduction, Congress intended that it …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login