Skip navigation

U.S. v. Bazel, No. 95-5117 (6th Cir.) (80 F.3d 1140) (April 11, 1996) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)

The sole question raised on this appeal was whether the defendant met the requirements set out both in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(4) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(4) and therefore was eligible for a "safety-valve" reduction of his sentence. He met all the other four requirements, but the district court denied him ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login