Skip navigation

U.S. v. Cuffie, No. 92-3263 (D.C. Cir.) (80 F.3d 514) (April 5, 1996) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)

This decision is a further amplification of the D.C. Circuit's important ruling in U.S. v. Smith, 77 F.3d 511 (D.C.Cir. 1996) about the prosecutor's duty, under the Brady rule, to disclose material information concerning its key witnesses. Here, the prosecutor failed to disclose that one of its chief witnesses, a ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login