Skip navigation

U.S. v. DiMarzo, No. 95-1441 (1st Cir.) (80 F.3d 656) (April 10, 1996) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)

Case held that defendant was not entitled to present evidence of harsh sentence he would receive if convicted since Federal juries perform no sentencing functions.

Two weeks ago, in Issue No. 18, we discussed the concept of jury nullification, and we quoted at great length some of Judge Wiseman's brilliant ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login