Skip navigation

U.S. v. Howard, No. 94-3905 (7th Cir.) (80 F.3d 1194) (April 5, 1996) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)

The Court stated: "Estimates of the drug quantities attributable to the defen- dant are permissible, of course, so long as they are based on evidence possessing sufficient indicia of reliability and not 'nebulous eyeballing.' United States v. Henderson, 58 F.3d 1145, 1151 (7th Cir. 1995)." (id., at 1204).

It then ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login