Skip navigation

U.S. v. Petty, No. 94-30394 (9th Cir.) (80 F.3d 1384) (April 10, 1996) (Judge William W. Schwarzer)

In this case the Ninth Circuit vacated a sentence because the court had not properly determined whether the defendant and his counsel had the opportunity to read and discuss an amendment to the presentence report, in violation of Rule 32(c)(3) of the Fed.R.Crim.P. The sentencing in this case was originally ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login