Skip navigation

U.S. v. Schinnell, No. 94-11155 (5th Cir.) (80 F.3d 1064) (April 9, 1996) (Judge Will L. Garwood)

One of the issues raised in this case was what it takes to "affect" a financial institution within the meaning of the nebulous provisions of U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(6)(B). Pushing that word to its logical limits, the Court held that wire fraud committed by the business's own employee "affected a financial …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login