Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Pretty, No. 95-6281 (10th Cir.) (98 F.3d 1213) (October 4, 1996) (Judge Albert J. Engel)

Loaded on Nov. 1, 1996 published in Punch and Jurists November 25, 1996
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Benefits received.

(See also U.S. v. Agostino, 132 F.3d 1183, 1196-97 (7th Cir. 1997) on the issue of whether a defendant must have received some personal benefit to merit a sentence enhancement under ยง 2C1.1(b)(2)(A)).

Court suggested that the sentencing court may consider benefits flowing to third parties in determining whether to ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Norwood, No. 96-232 (D.N.J.) (939 F.Supp. 1132) (September 6, 1996) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
  2. U.S. v. Pretty, No. 95-6281 (10th Cir.) (98 F.3d 1213) (October 4, 1996) (Judge Albert J. Engel)
  3. U.S. v. Pretty, No. 95-6281 (10th Cir.) (98 F.3d 1213) (October 4, 1996) (Judge Albert J. Engel)
  4. U.S. v. Paradies, No. 94-8485 (11th Cir.) (98 F.3d 1266) (September 23, 1996) (Judge Harry W. Wellford)
  5. U.S. v. Brown, No. 91-1420 (2nd Cir.) (961 F.2d 1039) (April 9, 1992) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: