Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Pretty, No. 95-6281 (10th Cir.) (98 F.3d 1213) (October 4, 1996) (Judge Albert J. Engel)

Loaded on Nov. 1, 1996 published in Punch and Jurists November 25, 1996
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Benefits received.

(See also U.S. v. Agostino, 132 F.3d 1183, 1196-97 (7th Cir. 1997) on the issue of whether a defendant must have received some personal benefit to merit a sentence enhancement under § 2C1.1(b)(2)(A)).

Court suggested that the sentencing court may consider benefits flowing to third parties in determining whether to …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Paradies, No. 94-8485 (11th Cir.) (98 F.3d 1266) (September 23, 1996) (Judge Harry W. Wellford)
  2. U.S. v. Pretty, No. 95-6281 (10th Cir.) (98 F.3d 1213) (October 4, 1996) (Judge Albert J. Engel)
  3. U.S. v. Pretty, No. 95-6281 (10th Cir.) (98 F.3d 1213) (October 4, 1996) (Judge Albert J. Engel)
  4. U.S. v. Norwood, No. 96-232 (D.N.J.) (939 F.Supp. 1132) (September 6, 1996) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
  5. U.S. v. Brown, No. 91-1420 (2nd Cir.) (961 F.2d 1039) (April 9, 1992) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: