Skip navigation

U.S. v. Stinson, No. 95-2407 (11th Cir.) (97 F.3d 466) (October 10, 1996) (Per Curiam)

Following a series of appeals, and the vacation of his original sentence, the defendant in this case argued that the district court had violated his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause when, at the resentencing, it imposed an upward departure which it had originally refused to apply at the first ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login