Skip navigation

U.S. v. Tatum, No. Cr. No. 3-96-10 (D.Minn.) (938 F.Supp. 542) (August 15, 1996) (Judge Michael James Davis)

This is one of those much ado about nothing cases that delves into the labyrinthine thicket of Guidelines law dealing with consecutive versus concurrent sentences when the defendant is already serving an undischarged term of imprisonment; and the decision is further complicated both by numerous incorrect references to a non-existent ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login