Skip navigation

Carriger v. Stewart, No. 95-99025 (9th Cir.) (95 F.3d 755) (September 24, 1996) (Judge Alex Kozinski)

The Court did, however, back off slightly by stating that the Supreme Court has made clear that "for such a claim to ever be successful, the defendant's burden of proof would 'necessarily be extraordinarily high'." (Id., at 957).

This case is noted for the astonishing statement that "it is still ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login