Douglas v. DeBruyn, No. IP 96-0656-C H/G (S.D.Ind.) (936 F.Supp. 572) (July 10, 1996) (Judge David F. Hamilton)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
October 28, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
Speaking of notable one-liners, in this case Judge Hamilton sums up the prevailing wisdom of the American policy that ignores the problem of preparing hoards of inmates for their release back to society. Faced with a claim that the assignment of an inmate to an "idle unit" violates the Eight ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Cecil, No. 95-3409 (10th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1344) (September 25, 1996) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Miranda-Santiago, No. 95-1301 (1st Cir.) (96 F.3d 517) (September 19, 1996) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Miranda-Santiago, No. 95-1301 (1st Cir.) (96 F.3d 517) (September 19, 1996) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Cheng, No. 95-1704, No. 1585 (2nd Cir.) (96 F.3d 654) (September 30, 1996) (Judge J. Edward Lumbard)
- U.S. v. Rybicki, No. 94-5360 (4th Cir.) (96 F.3d 754) (September 26, 1996) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- Alvarez-Machain v. U.S., No. 95-55464 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1246) (September 24, 1996) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Cheng, No. 95-1704, No. 1585 (2nd Cir.) (96 F.3d 654) (September 30, 1996) (Judge J. Edward Lumbard)
- U.S. v. Washman, No. 94-10486 (9th Cir.) (66 F.3d 210) (September 15, 1995) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- U.S. v. Cuellar, No. 95-50118 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1179) (September 17, 1996) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Lancaster, No. 95-5012 (4th Cir.) (96 F.3d 734) (March 20, 1996) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Alerta, No. 95-10224 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1230) (September 23, 1996) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- Douglas v. DeBruyn, No. IP 96-0656-C H/G (S.D.Ind.) (936 F.Supp. 572) (July 10, 1996) (Judge David F. Hamilton)
- U.S. v. Annigoni, No. 94-50422 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1132) (September 23, 1996) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Versaglio, No. 95-1238, No. 509 (2nd Cir.) (96 F.3d 637) (September 25, 1996) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- Lindh v. Murphy, No. 95-3608 (7th Cir.) (96 F.3d 856) (September 12, 1996) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Molina-Guevara, No. 94-5754 (3rd Cir.) (96 F.3d 698) (September 26, 1996) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- U.S. v. Cuellar, No. 95-50118 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1179) (September 17, 1996) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Annigoni, No. 94-50422 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1132) (September 23, 1996) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Miranda-Santiago, No. 95-1301 (1st Cir.) (96 F.3d 517) (September 19, 1996) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Washman, No. 94-10486 (9th Cir.) (66 F.3d 210) (September 15, 1995) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- U.S. v. Annigoni, No. 94-50422 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1132) (September 23, 1996) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Alerta, No. 95-10224 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1230) (September 23, 1996) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- Alvarez-Machain v. U.S., No. 95-55464 (9th Cir.) (96 F.3d 1246) (September 24, 1996) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Gray, No. 95-50533 (5th Cir.) (96 F.3d 769) (September 18, 1996) (Judge Stanwood R. Jr. Duval)
More from these topics:
- Washington Supreme Court: Judgment and Sentence Facially Invalid Based on Miscalculated Offender Score Despite Defendant’s Stipulation to Exceptional Sentence, Dec. 1, 2024. Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- Ninth Circuit Clarifies ‘Implicit Breach’ Case Law Regarding When Government Breaches Plea Agreement by Responding to Defendant’s Request for Downward Variant Sentence, Oct. 1, 2024. Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Breach of Plea/Coop./Immunity Agreements, Breach of trust, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- First Circuit Holds Government Breached Plea Agreement With Defendant by Failing to Explain Why It Agreed to Substantial Downward-Variant Sentence, Sept. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Third Circuit: Pennsylvania Second-Degree Aggravated Assault of a Protected Individual Not a ‘Violent Felony’ Under ACCA, Court Acknowledges ‘Bizarre Result’, Sept. 1, 2023. Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Protected Persons, Sentence Enhancements/Departures.
- Tenth Circuit Joins Other Circuits, Holding Federal Offense of Conviction, Not Underlying Conduct, Determines First Step Act Eligibility, Sept. 15, 2021. First Step Act, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Announces ‘Habitual Offender’ Statute Allows for Sentence of Probation Only, March 15, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Sentence of Probation.
- Fourth Circuit: Erroneous Career Offender Sentence Correctable in First Step Act Resentencing, July 15, 2020. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.