Skip navigation

U.S. v. Chalarca, No. 96-1171, No. 1942 (2nd Cir.) (95 F.3d 239) (September 12, 1996) (Judge Roger J. Miner)

This drug sentencing case focuses on the subtle distinctions between subsections (1)(A) and (1)(B) of U.S.S.G. ยง 1B1.3 (relevant conduct). Under subsection (1)(A) a defendant is accountable for all quantities of drugs "with which he was directly involved" without regard to whether he knew or could reasonably foresee the total ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login