Skip navigation

U.S. v. Chalarca, No. 96-1171, No. 1942 (2nd Cir.) (95 F.3d 239) (September 12, 1996) (Judge Roger J. Miner)

This drug sentencing case focuses on the subtle distinctions between subsections (1)(A) and (1)(B) of U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3 (relevant conduct). Under subsection (1)(A) a defendant is accountable for all quantities of drugs "with which he was directly involved" without regard to whether he knew or could reasonably foresee the total …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login