Skip navigation

U.S. v. Cheng, No. 95-1704, No. 1585 (2nd Cir.) (96 F.3d 654) (September 30, 1996) (Judge J. Edward Lumbard)

In this case the Court touched briefly on the apparent conflict between the language of U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1 which allows for loss calculations based on "intended loss" and the language of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3363 and 3364 which requires a showing of actual losses.

Here the Court affirmed a restitution ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login