Skip navigation

U.S. v. Keys, No. 93-50281 (9th Cir.) (95 F.3d 874) (October 11, 1996) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)

While the dissent labels this case "hypertechnical", its significance can best be measured by the weeping and wailing contained in Judge Kleinfeld's splenetic dissent. He rails that two recent Supreme Court cases (Bailey v. U.S., 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995) and U.S. v. Gaudin, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995)) have already done ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login