U.S. v. Polanco, No. 95-50341 (9th Cir.) (93 F.3d 555) (August 15, 1996) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
September 23, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Felon in Possession Statute.
Case held that 18 USC § 922(c) was constitutional as a valid exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Houlihan, No. 95-1614 (1st Cir.) (92 F.3d 1271) (August 22, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Houlihan, No. 95-1614 (1st Cir.) (92 F.3d 1271) (August 22, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- Coulter v. Gramley, No. 93-2621 (7th Cir.) (93 F.3d 394) (August 21, 1996) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Dewalt, No. 95-3103 (D.C. Cir.) (92 F.3d 1209) (August 20, 1996) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Flores, No. 94-30328 (9th Cir.) (93 F.3d 587) (August 19, 1996) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- Foont v. U.S., No. 95-2721 (2nd Cir.) (93 F.3d 76) (August 22, 1996) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- U.S. v. Behr, No. 95-6775 (11th Cir.) (93 F.3d 764) (September 5, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Doe, No. 96-1081, No. 1905 (2nd Cir.) (93 F.3d 67) (August 21, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Houlihan, No. 95-1614 (1st Cir.) (92 F.3d 1271) (August 22, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Flores, No. 94-30328 (9th Cir.) (93 F.3d 587) (August 19, 1996) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- U.S. v. Neal, No. 94-6002 (6th Cir.) (93 F.3d 219) (August 9, 1996) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- U.S. v. Polanco, No. 95-50341 (9th Cir.) (93 F.3d 555) (August 15, 1996) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Houlihan, No. 95-1614 (1st Cir.) (92 F.3d 1271) (August 22, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Hawley, No. 95-3061 (10th Cir.) (93 F.3d 682) (August 19, 1996) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- Parker v. Boyer, No. 95-3988 (8th Cir.) (93 F.3d 445) (August 16, 1996) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Randolph, No. 95-30137 (9th Cir.) (93 F.3d 656) (August 22, 1996) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Polanco, No. 95-50341 (9th Cir.) (93 F.3d 555) (August 15, 1996) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Dewalt, No. 95-3103 (D.C. Cir.) (92 F.3d 1209) (August 20, 1996) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Behr, No. 95-6775 (11th Cir.) (93 F.3d 764) (September 5, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Taylor, No. 95-1318, No. 1130 (2nd Cir.) (92 F.3d 1313) (August 16, 1996) (Judge Wilfred Feinberg)
More from these topics:
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Where Defense Counsel Failed to Understand State Self-Defense Statute Provides Complete Defense to Felony Murder Based on Felon-in-Possession Charge, Oct. 1, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Felon in Possession Statute, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Murder/Felony Murder.
- 10th Circuit Reverses Guidelines Enhancement Because Possession of Ammo Does Not Facilitate Possession of a Firearm, Nov. 1, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Felon in Possession Statute, Stipulations.
- BOP Hits Back Hard After Federal Prisoner in Arizona Brandishes Gun, June 15, 2023. Felon in Possession Statute, Bureau of Prisons (BOP).
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Criminal Record Alone Does Not Justify Patfrisk, Gun Discovered in Waistband Suppressed, Dec. 15, 2022. Felon in Possession Statute, Suppression of Evidence, Pat Down Searches.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Under State Felon in Possession of Firearm Statute, Possessing Multiple Firearms Simultaneously Constitutes One Offense, Not Multiple, Nov. 15, 2022. Felon in Possession Statute, In Connection With Another Felony Offense.
- SCOTUS: Rehaif Error Doesn’t Automatically Require Reversal of Conviction, Plain-Error Test Must Be Satisfied for Re-lief, Feb. 15, 2022. Felon in Possession Statute, Firearms, Plain/Harmless Error.
- Ninth Circuit: Rehaif Error Requires Automatic Dismissal of Indictment, Jan. 15, 2021. Felon in Possession Statute, Pro Se Issues, Knowingly and Voluntarily Made.
- Kansas Supreme Court Announces Residual Clause of Law Prohibiting Knife Possession by Felons Unconstitutionally Vague, Oct. 15, 2020. Felon in Possession Statute, Vagueness/Overbreadth.
- Tenth Circuit: District Court Plainly Erred in Giving Erroneous Constructive Possession of Firearm Instruction, Conviction Reversed, Sept. 15, 2020. Jury Instructions, Felon in Possession Statute.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.